Welcome
   Home | Texts by category | | Quick Search:   
Authors
Works by Plutarch
Pages of The Comparison of Poplicola with Solon



Previous | Next
                  

The Comparison of Poplicola with Solon   


There is something singular in the present parallel which has not
occurred in any other of the lives; that the one should be the imitator
of the other, and the other his best evidence. Upon the survey of
Solon's sentence to Croesus in favour of Tellus's happiness, it seems
more applicable to Poplicola; for Tellus, whose virtuous life and
dying well had gained him the name of the happiest man, yet was never
celebrated in Solon's poems for a good man, nor have his children
or any magistracy of his deserved a memorial; but Poplicola's life
was the most eminent amongst the Romans, as well for the greatness
of his virtue as his power, and also since his death many amongst
the distinguished families, even in our days, the Poplicolae, Messalae,
and Valerii, after a lapse of six hundred years, acknowledge him as
the fountain of their honour. Besides, Tellus, though keeping his
post and fighting like a valiant soldier, was yet slain by his enemies;
but Poplicola, the better fortune, slew his, and saw his country victorious
under his command. And his honours and triumphs brought him, which
was Solon's ambition, to a happy end; the ejaculation which, in his
verses against Mimnermus about the continuance of man's life, he himself
made-
"Mourned let me die; and may I, when life ends,
Occasion sighs and sorrows to my friends," is evidence to Poplicola's
happiness; his death did not only draw tears from his friends and
acquaintance, but was the object of universal regret and sorrow through
the whole city, the women deplored his loss as that of a son, brother,
or common father. "Wealth I would have," said Solon, "but wealth by
wrong procure would not," because punishment would follow. But Poplicola's
riches were not only justly his, but he spent them nobly in doing
good to the distressed. So that if Solon was reputed the wisest man,
we must allow Poplicola to be the happiest; for what Solon wished
for as the greatest and most perfect good, this Poplicola had, and
used and enjoyed to his death.
And as Solon may thus be said to have contributed to Poplicola's glory,
so did also Poplicola to his, by his choice of him as his model in
the formation of republican institutions; in reducing, for example,
the excessive powers and assumption of the consulship. Several of
his laws, indeed, he actually transferred to Rome, as his empowering
the people to elect their officers, and allowing offenders the liberty
of appealing to the people, as Solon did to the jurors. He did not,
indeed, create a new senate, as Solon did, but augmented the old to
almost double its number. The appointment of treasurers again, the
quaestors, has a like origin; with the intent that the chief magistrate
should not, if of good character, be withdrawn from greater matters;
or, if bad, have the greater temptation to injustice, by holding both
the government and treasury in his hands. The aversion to tyranny
was stronger in Poplicola; any one who attempted usurpation could,
by Solon's law, only be punished upon conviction; but Poplicola made
it death before a trial. And though Solon justly gloried, that, when
arbitrary power was absolutely offered to him by circumstances, and
when his countrymen would have willingly seen him accept it, he yet
declined it; still Poplicola merited no less, who, receiving a despotic
command, converted it to a popular office, and did not employ the
whole legal power which he held. We must allow, indeed, that Solon
was before Poplicola in observing that-
"A people always minds its rulers best
When it is neither humoured nor oppressed."
The remission of debts was peculiar to Solon; it was his great means
for confirming the citizens' liberty; for a mere law to give all men
equal rights is but useless, if the poor must sacrifice those rights
to their debts, and, in the very seats and sanctuaries of equality,
the courts of justice, the offices of state, and the public discussions,
be more than anywhere at the beck and bidding of the rich. A yet more
extraordinary success was, that, although usually civil violence is
caused by any remission of debts, upon this one occasion this dangerous

Previous | Next
Site Search